Does Pleasures of the Flesh end with hope?

No. Less hopeful than 91% of well-known films. This describes how the film comes across as a whole, measured against other well-known films; it is not a content list.

Is Pleasures of the Flesh sad?

Yes. More sad than 88% of well-known films. This describes how the film comes across as a whole, measured against other well-known films; it is not a content list.

Is Pleasures of the Flesh easy watching?

Not especially. Less comforting than 74% of well-known films. This describes how the film comes across as a whole, measured against other well-known films; it is not a content list.

Is Pleasures of the Flesh scary?

Somewhat. More frightening than 67% of well-known films. This describes how the film comes across as a whole, measured against other well-known films; it is not a content list.

Is Pleasures of the Flesh violent?

About average. Almost exactly mid-range for a well-known film. This describes how the film comes across as a whole, measured against other well-known films; it is not a content list.

Pleasures of the Flesh

Name: Pleasures of the Flesh
Genre: Drama, Comedy, Crime
Released: 1965
Duration: 91 min
Rating: 5.8
Cast: Katsuo Nakamura, Mariko Kaga, Masako Yagi, Yumiko Nogawa, Toshiko Higuchi

Directed by Nagisa Ōshima

Produced by Sozosha

196591 min5.8 / 10

A morally corrosive descent into hedonism and criminality, where a man's murder and blackmail spiral into compulsive pleasure-seeking and mounting regret.

After committing murder, businessman Atsushi is blackmailed into keeping a suitcase of embezzled money. What follows is a descent into lustful, reckless actions and regret.

Clusters

Doomed Romantic Obsession Depression and Complicity Dark Comedy Nightmares Sexy Romance Films Crime and Corruption

Genres

Drama Comedy Crime

Keywords

Corruption Money Murder Desire Embezzlement Stolen Cash Pleasure Spending Money Sex

Questions people ask

Does Pleasures of the Flesh end with hope? No. Less hopeful than 91% of films.
Is Pleasures of the Flesh sad? Yes. More sad than 88% of films.
Is Pleasures of the Flesh easy watching? Not especially. Less comforting than 74% of films.
Is Pleasures of the Flesh scary? Somewhat. More frightening than 67% of films.
Is Pleasures of the Flesh violent? About average. Almost exactly mid-range.

These describe how the film comes across, measured across the whole film and compared with other well-known films. They are not a content list — nothing here was counted or checked scene by scene, so for age-suitability or specific content use a classification board or a dedicated content-warning service.

29/ 100